Scoring Distribution
How many players a team’s points actually came from — spread across players rather than across weeks, which is what Consistency measures. Built from each started player’s share of the team’s score, shown as an “effective contributors” count: a team scoring evenly across four starters reads 4.0, while one reading 2.4 got its points from about two and a half people however many were in the lineup. Bench points are excluded, because they never counted toward the real score. Neither end is straightforwardly better — leaning on a star wins weeks and is one injury or bye from losing them.
Each week below is that week alone, not a running total — useful for spotting a team’s trend, and for checking a given week’s numbers at a glance. The Season column on the right is the cumulative total shown on the main Power Rankings page. Every column sorts: click a heading to reorder the table by that week.
6.7 #5 | 6.9 #3 | 7.0 #2 | 6.9 #2 | 5.8 #7 | 7.0 #2 | 6.5 #4 | 7.9 #1 | 7.7 #1 | 12.0 #1 | |
6.2 #8 | 7.3 #1 | 6.4 #6 | 7.4 #1 | 7.9 #1 | 6.2 #10 | 8.0 #1 | 6.6 #6 | 7.0 #5 | 11.4 #2 | |
5.4 #10 | 6.8 #4 | 5.3 #9 | 5.9 #8 | 5.3 #9 | 7.0 #4 | 6.5 #5 | 7.4 #2 | 7.0 #4 | 11.3 #3 | |
6.9 #3 | 6.5 #5 | 6.9 #4 | 6.0 #7 | 7.2 #2 | 7.0 #2 | 6.1 #8 | 6.0 #9 | 5.3 #10 | 10.8 #4 | |
6.3 #7 | 4.1 #10 | 6.3 #7 | 6.5 #4 | 7.2 #3 | 6.7 #6 | 7.3 #2 | 6.1 #8 | 6.8 #7 | 10.7 #5 | |
6.4 #6 | 6.1 #7 | 6.7 #5 | 6.9 #3 | 5.3 #8 | 7.1 #1 | 7.1 #3 | 6.6 #5 | 7.4 #3 | 10.2 #6 | |
7.4 #1 | 7.0 #2 | 6.1 #8 | 6.2 #6 | 6.4 #6 | 7.0 #5 | 6.5 #6 | 6.5 #7 | 5.9 #9 | 9.8 #7 | |
5.6 #9 | 5.8 #8 | 7.2 #1 | 5.9 #9 | 6.7 #5 | 6.2 #8 | 4.7 #10 | 7.1 #4 | 6.9 #6 | 9.7 #8 | |
6.9 #2 | 6.3 #6 | 7.0 #3 | 6.4 #5 | 7.0 #4 | 6.6 #7 | 6.3 #7 | 7.2 #3 | 6.2 #8 | 9.4 #9 | |
6.7 #4 | 4.9 #9 | 5.2 #10 | 4.8 #10 | 5.2 #10 | 6.2 #9 | 5.2 #9 | 5.8 #10 | 7.5 #2 | 7.5 #10 |